2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1963 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (345 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 215 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (130 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Ram weights approximately 496 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (510 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 312 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (198 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 1963 Triumph 2000 | |
| Make | Dodge | Triumph |
| Model | Ram | 2000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2498 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 345 HP | 130 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 510 Nm | 198 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4420 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2700 mm |
