2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1964 NSU 1000
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 NSU 1000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 NSU 1000 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 169 more horse power than 1964 NSU 1000. (43 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1964 NSU 1000.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 NSU 1000. (72 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 NSU 1000.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 1964 NSU 1000 | |
| Make | Dodge | NSU |
| Model | Ram | 1000 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 43 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 72 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 66.6 mm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3800 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1500 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2260 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 37 L |
