2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1967 Mini MK I
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mini MK I. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mini MK I would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 178 more horse power than 1967 Mini MK I. (34 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1967 Mini MK I.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1967 Mini MK I, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 175 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mini MK I. (60 Nm @ 2900 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mini MK I.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1967 Mini MK I | |
Make | Dodge | Mini |
Model | Ram | MK I |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 848 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 60 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2900 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 3060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1420 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2040 mm |