2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1968 Lotus Elan
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 1968 Lotus Elan. (104 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1968 Lotus Elan.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 1968 Lotus Elan | |
| Make | Dodge | Lotus |
| Model | Ram | Elan |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1558 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4290 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2440 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 59 L |
