2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Ram weights approximately 383 kg more than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 1976 Rolls-Royce Silver Shadow | |
| Make | Dodge | Rolls-Royce |
| Model | Ram | Silver Shadow |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 6750 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 310 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2537 kg | 2154 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5820 mm | 5180 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1910 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3560 mm | 3060 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 15.7 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 107 L |
