2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1991 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1991 Mazda 626. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Dodge Ram has automatic transmission and 1991 Mazda 626 has manual transmission. 1991 Mazda 626 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Dodge Ram will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1991 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Body Type | Pickup | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 6 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6350 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2030 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2000 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 4080 mm | 2580 mm |