2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1994 Mitsubishi FTO
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Mitsubishi FTO would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO. (197 HP @ 7500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1994 Mitsubishi FTO.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 1994 Mitsubishi FTO | |
| Make | Dodge | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Ram | FTO |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1994 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1996 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 7500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 78.4 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 69 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 5320 mm | 4370 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1740 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1870 mm | 1310 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2510 mm |
