2009 Dodge Ram vs. 1997 Toyota Celica
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Toyota Celica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Toyota Celica would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1997 Toyota Celica. (114 HP @ 5800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Toyota Celica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 1997 Toyota Celica. (154 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1997 Toyota Celica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 1997 Toyota Celica | |
Make | Dodge | Toyota |
Model | Ram | Celica |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1762 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 114 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 235 Nm | 154 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 78 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1760 mm |