2009 Dodge Ram vs. 2003 Mazda 323

To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Mazda 323. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Mazda 323 would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2003 Mazda 323. (97 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2003 Mazda 323.

Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Mazda 323, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Mazda 323. (145 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Mazda 323.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Dodge Ram 2003 Mazda 323
Make Dodge Mazda
Model Ram 323
Year Released 2009 2003
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3700 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 212 HP 97 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 235 Nm 145 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3700 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 3 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Length 5320 mm 4500 mm
Vehicle Width 2020 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1870 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2900 mm 2620 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 98 L 55 L