2009 Dodge Ram vs. 2005 Mazda Marathon
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Mazda Marathon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Mazda Marathon would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Ram (212 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 108 more horse power than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (104 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Ram should accelerate faster than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mazda Marathon. (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mazda Marathon.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Dodge Ram | 2005 Mazda Marathon | |
| Make | Dodge | Mazda |
| Model | Ram | Marathon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Van |
| Engine Size | 3700 cc | 2260 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 212 HP | 104 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 235 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 86 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 94 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.7:1 | 8.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 3 seats | 10 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2680 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 76 L |
