2009 Dodge Ram vs. 2008 Mazda Rustler
To start off, 2009 Dodge Ram is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mazda Rustler. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mazda Rustler would be higher. At 3,700 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Mazda Rustler, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Ram (235 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 133 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mazda Rustler. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Ram will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mazda Rustler.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 2008 Mazda Rustler | |
Make | Dodge | Mazda |
Model | Ram | Rustler |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Engine Size | 3700 cc | 1323 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 235 Nm | 102 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 88.1 mm | 71 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 83.6 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 3 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Wheelbase Size | 2900 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 98 L | 54 L |