2009 Dodge Ram vs. 2012 Volkswagen up
To start off, 2012 Volkswagen up is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Dodge Ram. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Dodge Ram would be higher. At 6,690 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Ram is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Ram weights approximately 433 kg more than 2012 Volkswagen up.
Because 2009 Dodge Ram is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Ram. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Volkswagen up, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Ram | 2012 Volkswagen up | |
Make | Dodge | Volkswagen |
Model | Ram | up |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Pickup | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 6690 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 350 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 3013 RPM | 60 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 3 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1362 kg | 929 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5840 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2440 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1900 mm | 1480 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3580 mm | 2420 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.2 L/100km | 4.5 L/100km |