2009 Dodge Viper vs. 2008 MG ZT
To start off, 2009 Dodge Viper is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 MG ZT. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 MG ZT would be higher. At 8,356 cc (10 cylinders), 2009 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Dodge Viper (600 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 466 more horse power than 2008 MG ZT. (134 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 2008 MG ZT. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Dodge Viper weights approximately 66 kg more than 2008 MG ZT. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Dodge Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Dodge Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 MG ZT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Dodge Viper (759 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 544 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 MG ZT. (215 Nm @ 2100 RPM). This means 2009 Dodge Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 MG ZT.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Dodge Viper | 2008 MG ZT | |
Make | Dodge | MG |
Model | Viper | ZT |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 8356 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 600 HP | 134 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 759 Nm | 215 Nm |
Torque RPM | 5000 RPM | 2100 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.3:1 | 19.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1691 kg | 1625 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1920 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1220 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2520 mm | 2750 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 12.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 61 L | 65 L |