2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1952 Renault Fregate
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Renault Fregate. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Renault Fregate would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Renault Fregate is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Renault Fregate weights approximately 15 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1952 Renault Fregate is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Renault Fregate. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1952 Renault Fregate | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Bravo | Fregate |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1295 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2810 mm |