2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1956 Ford 12 M
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1956 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1956 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,367 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1956 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1956 Ford 12 M.
Because 1956 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1956 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1956 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Fiat | Ford |
Model | Bravo | 12 M |
Year Released | 2009 | 1956 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1367 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2500 mm |