2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,488 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Nissan Cedric is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 265 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Bravo | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2540 mm |