2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1965 MG 1100
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 MG 1100 would be higher. At 1,367 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1965 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1965 MG 1100. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 525 kg more than 1965 MG 1100. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 123 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1965 MG 1100 | |
Make | Fiat | MG |
Model | Bravo | 1100 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1367 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 825 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2380 mm |