2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1965 Volvo 220
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Volvo 220. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Volvo 220 would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 89 more horse power than 1965 Volvo 220. (74 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1965 Volvo 220. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 420 kg more than 1965 Volvo 220. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (361 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Volvo 220. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Volvo 220.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1965 Volvo 220 | |
Make | Fiat | Volvo |
Model | Bravo | 220 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1956 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |