2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1968 Oldsmobile 442
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Oldsmobile 442. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Oldsmobile 442 would be higher. At 7,464 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Oldsmobile 442 weights approximately 335 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo.
Because 1968 Oldsmobile 442 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Oldsmobile 442. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1968 Oldsmobile 442 | |
Make | Fiat | Oldsmobile |
Model | Bravo | 442 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1367 cc | 7464 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1685 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5180 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1960 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2850 mm |