2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,956 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (163 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 114 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 665 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (361 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 266 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Fiat | Zastava |
Model | Bravo | 102 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1956 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 163 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 361 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2160 mm |