2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 1991 Lincoln Continental
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1991 Lincoln Continental. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1991 Lincoln Continental would be higher. At 3,800 cc (6 cylinders), 1991 Lincoln Continental is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1991 Lincoln Continental weights approximately 205 kg more than 2009 Fiat Bravo.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 1991 Lincoln Continental | |
Make | Fiat | Lincoln |
Model | Bravo | Continental |
Year Released | 2009 | 1991 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1908 cc | 3800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 5220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2780 mm |