2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 2000 Tata Indica
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Tata Indica. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Tata Indica would be higher. At 1,404 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Tata Indica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (119 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2000 Tata Indica. (59 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2000 Tata Indica. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 420 kg more than 2000 Tata Indica. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Bravo (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Tata Indica. (105 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Bravo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Tata Indica.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Bravo | 2000 Tata Indica | |
Make | Fiat | Tata |
Model | Bravo | Indica |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1404 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 119 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 206 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1490 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2810 mm | 2410 mm |