2009 Fiat Bravo vs. 2002 ZAZ Wagon
To start off, 2009 Fiat Bravo is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 ZAZ Wagon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 ZAZ Wagon would be higher. At 1,368 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Bravo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Bravo (148 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. (50 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Bravo should accelerate faster than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Bravo weights approximately 611 kg more than 2002 ZAZ Wagon. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Bravo | 2002 ZAZ Wagon | |
| Make | Fiat | ZAZ |
| Model | Bravo | Wagon |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1368 cc | 1091 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 50 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 72 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 9.5:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1356 kg | 745 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4340 mm | 3830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1570 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2330 mm |
