2009 Fiat Croma vs. 1944 Simca 5
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 65 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1944 Simca 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1944 Simca 5 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Croma (146 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1944 Simca 5. (14 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1944 Simca 5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 376 kg more than 1944 Simca 5. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1944 Simca 5 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1944 Simca 5. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Croma | 1944 Simca 5 | |
| Make | Fiat | Simca |
| Model | Croma | 5 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1944 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2198 cc | 570 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 146 HP | 14 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 564 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3220 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1280 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1350 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2010 mm |
