2009 Fiat Croma vs. 1968 Volkswagen 1303
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Volkswagen 1303. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Volkswagen 1303 would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Fiat Croma (146 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. (34 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma should accelerate faster than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 190 kg more than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Volkswagen 1303 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Volkswagen 1303. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. (84 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1968 Volkswagen 1303. 2009 Fiat Croma has automatic transmission and 1968 Volkswagen 1303 has manual transmission. 1968 Volkswagen 1303 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Fiat Croma will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Croma | 1968 Volkswagen 1303 | |
Make | Fiat | Volkswagen |
Model | Croma | 1303 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1191 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 146 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 84 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 77 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 94.6 mm | 64 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 7.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 40 L |