2009 Fiat Croma vs. 1982 Mazda 121
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Mazda 121. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Mazda 121 would be higher. At 1,968 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Mazda 121 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 395 kg more than 1982 Mazda 121.
Because 1982 Mazda 121 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Mazda 121. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Croma | 1982 Mazda 121 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Croma | 121 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1794 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1505 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1610 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2520 mm |