2009 Fiat Croma vs. 1986 Mercury Cougar
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Mercury Cougar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Mercury Cougar would be higher. At 2,300 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Mercury Cougar is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 115 kg more than 1986 Mercury Cougar.
Because 1986 Mercury Cougar is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Mercury Cougar. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Croma, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Croma | 1986 Mercury Cougar | |
| Make | Fiat | Mercury |
| Model | Croma | Cougar |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1910 cc | 2300 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1595 kg | 1480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4790 mm | 5140 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2650 mm |
