2009 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Renault Clio
To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Renault Clio. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Renault Clio would be higher. At 2,198 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Croma is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Renault Clio (177 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Croma. (145 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Renault Clio weights approximately 120 kg more than 2009 Fiat Croma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Croma (203 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Renault Clio. (200 Nm @ 5250 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Croma | 2005 Renault Clio | |
Make | Fiat | Renault |
Model | Croma | Clio |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2198 cc | 1870 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 203 Nm | 200 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Top Speed | 205 km/hour | 222 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 10.1 seconds | 7.1 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 940 kg | 1060 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1780 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2690 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.6 L/100km | 8.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 62 L | 50 L |