2009 Fiat Croma vs. 2005 Suzuki Reno

To start off, 2009 Fiat Croma is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Suzuki Reno. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Suzuki Reno would be higher. At 1,999 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Suzuki Reno is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Suzuki Reno (126 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 8 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Croma. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Suzuki Reno should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Croma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Croma weights approximately 353 kg more than 2005 Suzuki Reno.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Croma (280 Nm) has 110 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Suzuki Reno. (170 Nm). This means 2009 Fiat Croma will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Suzuki Reno.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Fiat Croma 2005 Suzuki Reno
Make Fiat Suzuki
Model Croma Reno
Year Released 2009 2005
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1910 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 118 HP 126 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 280 Nm 170 Nm
Engine Bore Size 82 mm 86.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 90.4 mm 86 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 9.6:1
Drive Type Front Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1595 kg 1242 kg
Vehicle Length 4790 mm 4300 mm
Vehicle Width 1780 mm 1730 mm
Vehicle Height 1610 mm 1450 mm
Wheelbase Size 2710 mm 2490 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 6.1 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 62 L 55 L