2009 Fiat Doblo vs. 2006 GMC Yukon
To start off, 2009 Fiat Doblo is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 GMC Yukon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 GMC Yukon would be higher. At 5,964 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 GMC Yukon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 GMC Yukon (335 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Doblo. (118 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Doblo.
Because 2006 GMC Yukon is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Fiat Doblo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 GMC Yukon will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 GMC Yukon (509 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Doblo. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2006 GMC Yukon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Doblo.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Doblo | 2006 GMC Yukon | |
Make | Fiat | GMC |
Model | Doblo | Yukon |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Panel Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1910 cc | 5964 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 118 HP | 335 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 509 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82 mm | 102 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 90.4 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.1:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4260 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2590 mm | 2950 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 98 L |