2009 Fiat Panda vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 1,107 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Panda weights approximately 340 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Because 1965 Seat 600 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 Seat 600. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Panda (88 Nm @ 2750 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Panda | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Fiat | Seat |
| Model | Panda | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1107 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 88 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2010 mm |
