2009 Fiat Panda vs. 1978 Mazda 626
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1978 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1978 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 1,586 cc (4 cylinders), 1978 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1978 Mazda 626 weights approximately 130 kg more than 2009 Fiat Panda.
Because 1978 Mazda 626 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1978 Mazda 626. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Panda | 1978 Mazda 626 | |
Make | Fiat | Mazda |
Model | Panda | 626 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1978 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1107 cc | 1586 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1045 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2520 mm |