2009 Fiat Panda vs. 1986 Nissan Pulsar
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Nissan Pulsar. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Nissan Pulsar would be higher. At 1,270 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Nissan Pulsar is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Nissan Pulsar (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Panda. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1986 Nissan Pulsar should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Panda weights approximately 50 kg more than 1986 Nissan Pulsar.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Nissan Pulsar (96 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 8 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Panda. (88 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 1986 Nissan Pulsar will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Panda | 1986 Nissan Pulsar | |
Make | Fiat | Nissan |
Model | Panda | Pulsar |
Year Released | 2009 | 1986 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1107 cc | 1270 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 59 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 96 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 865 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 2420 mm |