2009 Fiat Panda vs. 2002 MCC Crossblade
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Crossblade. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Crossblade would be higher. At 1,248 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Fiat Panda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 MCC Crossblade (70 HP) has 1 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Panda. (69 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 MCC Crossblade should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Panda weights approximately 400 kg more than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Because 2009 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 MCC Crossblade. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Panda (180 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 78 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Crossblade. (102 Nm @ 3210 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Panda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Crossblade.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Panda | 2002 MCC Crossblade | |
| Make | Fiat | MCC |
| Model | Panda | Crossblade |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Engine Size | 1248 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 69 HP | 70 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 102 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3210 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 740 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 2630 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1520 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 1810 mm |
