2009 Fiat Panda vs. 2004 Maybach 62
To start off, 2009 Fiat Panda is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Maybach 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Maybach 62 would be higher. At 5,513 cc (12 cylinders), 2004 Maybach 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Maybach 62 (542 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 489 more horse power than 2009 Fiat Panda. (53 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Maybach 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Maybach 62 weights approximately 1890 kg more than 2009 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2004 Maybach 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Maybach 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Panda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Maybach 62 (900 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 812 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Fiat Panda. (88 Nm @ 2750 RPM). This means 2004 Maybach 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Fiat Panda. 2004 Maybach 62 has automatic transmission and 2009 Fiat Panda has manual transmission. 2009 Fiat Panda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2004 Maybach 62 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Fiat Panda | 2004 Maybach 62 | |
Make | Fiat | Maybach |
Model | Panda | 62 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1107 cc | 5513 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 542 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 88 Nm | 900 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2750 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 70 mm | 82.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 72 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 15 seconds | 5.4 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 2805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3540 mm | 6170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1550 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2310 mm | 3830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.7 L/100km | 16 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 35 L | 110 L |