2009 Fiat Sedici vs. 1982 Zastava 132
To start off, 2009 Fiat Sedici is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 1,756 cc (4 cylinders), 1982 Zastava 132 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 106 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Fiat Sedici weights approximately 167 kg more than 1982 Zastava 132.
Because 2009 Fiat Sedici is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1982 Zastava 132. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Fiat Sedici will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Fiat Sedici (145 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 3 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 132. (142 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Fiat Sedici will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 132.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Fiat Sedici | 1982 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Fiat | Zastava |
| Model | Sedici | 132 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1586 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 106 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 145 Nm | 142 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1265 kg | 1098 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4120 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1430 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2510 mm | 2560 mm |
