2009 Ford Bantam vs. 1963 Jeep CJ5
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Jeep CJ5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Jeep CJ5 would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1963 Jeep CJ5 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 15 more horse power than 1963 Jeep CJ5. (59 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1963 Jeep CJ5. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1963 Jeep CJ5 weights approximately 66 kg more than 2009 Ford Bantam.
Because 1963 Jeep CJ5 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Ford Bantam. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 Jeep CJ5 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1963 Jeep CJ5 (145 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Bantam. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1963 Jeep CJ5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Bantam | 1963 Jeep CJ5 | |
Make | Ford | Jeep |
Model | Bantam | CJ5 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Pickup | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 59 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 145 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1032 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2060 mm |