2009 Ford Bantam vs. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Sunbeam Tiger would be higher. At 4,738 cc (8 cylinders), 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger (197 HP) has 123 more horse power than 2009 Ford Bantam. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Sunbeam Tiger should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Sunbeam Tiger weights approximately 174 kg more than 2009 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Sunbeam Tiger is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Sunbeam Tiger. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Bantam | 1967 Sunbeam Tiger | |
Make | Ford | Sunbeam |
Model | Bantam | Tiger |
Year Released | 2009 | 1967 |
Body Type | Pickup | Roadster |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 4738 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 197 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1140 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1570 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 27 L |