2009 Ford Bantam vs. 1995 Mazda Midge
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,323 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Bantam (74 HP) has 7 more horse power than 1995 Mazda Midge. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Bantam should accelerate faster than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford Bantam (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 9 more torque (in Nm) than 1995 Mazda Midge. (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford Bantam will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1995 Mazda Midge.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Bantam | 1995 Mazda Midge | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | Bantam | Midge |
Year Released | 2009 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 1323 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 101 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1470 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1400 mm |