2009 Ford Bantam vs. 2005 Peugeot 807
To start off, 2009 Ford Bantam is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Peugeot 807. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Peugeot 807 would be higher. At 2,229 cc (4 cylinders), 2005 Peugeot 807 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 807 (152 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2009 Ford Bantam. (94 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 807 should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Peugeot 807 weights approximately 104 kg more than 2009 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 807 (203 Nm) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford Bantam. (135 Nm). This means 2005 Peugeot 807 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford Bantam.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford Bantam | 2005 Peugeot 807 | |
Make | Ford | Peugeot |
Model | Bantam | 807 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Pickup | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1597 cc | 2229 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 94 HP | 152 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 203 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 176 km/hour | 196 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 984 kg | 1088 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2670 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.4 L/100km | 9.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 80 L |