2009 Ford E-150 vs. 1965 Seat 600
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Seat 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Seat 600 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-150 weights approximately 391 kg more than 1965 Seat 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Seat 600. (47 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Seat 600.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-150 | 1965 Seat 600 | |
| Make | Ford | Seat |
| Model | E-150 | 600 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 767 cc |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 389 Nm | 47 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 575 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3300 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1390 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1360 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2010 mm |
