2009 Ford E-150 vs. 1974 Mazda RX-2
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1974 Mazda RX-2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1974 Mazda RX-2 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 106 more horse power than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (119 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 1974 Mazda RX-2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-150 weights approximately 6 kg more than 1974 Mazda RX-2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 232 more torque (in Nm) than 1974 Mazda RX-2. (157 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1974 Mazda RX-2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-150 | 1974 Mazda RX-2 | |
Make | Ford | Mazda |
Model | E-150 | RX-2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1974 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2292 cc |
Engine Type | V | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 119 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 960 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4160 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2480 mm |