2009 Ford E-150 vs. 1976 TVR M
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 TVR M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 TVR M would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-150 weights approximately 77 kg more than 1976 TVR M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 1976 TVR M has manual transmission. 1976 TVR M will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-150 | 1976 TVR M | |
| Make | Ford | TVR |
| Model | E-150 | M |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4605 cc | 1599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 972 kg | 895 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5390 mm | 3920 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1790 mm | 1630 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2060 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2290 mm |
