2009 Ford E-150 vs. 2000 Ford TS-50
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Ford TS-50. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Ford TS-50 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 2000 Ford TS-50. (128 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford TS-50. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford TS-50 weights approximately 242 kg more than 2009 Ford E-150.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (389 Nm) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Ford TS-50. (175 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Ford TS-50.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-150 | 2000 Ford TS-50 | |
Make | Ford | Ford |
Model | E-150 | TS-50 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1989 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 175 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1208 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 132 L |