2009 Ford E-150 vs. 2006 Mercury Mountaineer
To start off, 2009 Ford E-150 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mercury Mountaineer. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mercury Mountaineer would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (293 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2009 Ford E-150. (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer should accelerate faster than 2009 Ford E-150.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mercury Mountaineer (407 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Ford E-150. (389 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2006 Mercury Mountaineer will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Ford E-150.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-150 | 2006 Mercury Mountaineer | |
Make | Ford | Mercury |
Model | E-150 | Mountaineer |
Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
Body Type | Van | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 293 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 389 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4920 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.2 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 15.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 85 L |