2009 Ford E-150 vs. 2012 Nissan Micra
To start off, 2012 Nissan Micra is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Ford E-150. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Ford E-150 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-150 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-150 (225 HP) has 146 more horse power than 2012 Nissan Micra. (79 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-150 should accelerate faster than 2012 Nissan Micra.
Because 2009 Ford E-150 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-150. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Micra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-150 (389 Nm) has 281 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Nissan Micra. (108 Nm). This means 2009 Ford E-150 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Nissan Micra. 2009 Ford E-150 has automatic transmission and 2012 Nissan Micra has manual transmission. 2012 Nissan Micra will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-150 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-150 | 2012 Nissan Micra | |
Make | Ford | Nissan |
Model | E-150 | Micra |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | Van | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 79 HP |
Torque | 389 Nm | 108 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 3780 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1666 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2120 mm | 1514 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2449 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 14.7 L/100km | 5.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 132 L | 46 L |