2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1942 Skoda Superb
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 67 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1942 Skoda Superb. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1942 Skoda Superb would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 146 more horse power than 1942 Skoda Superb. (79 HP @ 3500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1942 Skoda Superb. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1942 Skoda Superb weights approximately 834 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Because 2009 Ford E-250 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Ford E-250. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1942 Skoda Superb, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1942 Skoda Superb | |
Make | Ford | Skoda |
Model | E-250 | Superb |
Year Released | 2009 | 1942 |
Body Type | Van | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 3137 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 79 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1730 mm |