2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1950 Maserati A6G
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 59 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Maserati A6G. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Maserati A6G would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 161 more horse power than 1950 Maserati A6G. (64 HP @ 4700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1950 Maserati A6G. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Ford E-250 weights approximately 90 kg more than 1950 Maserati A6G. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1950 Maserati A6G has manual transmission. 1950 Maserati A6G will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1950 Maserati A6G | |
Make | Ford | Maserati |
Model | E-250 | A6G |
Year Released | 2009 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4700 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 876 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2560 mm |