2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1952 MG YB
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 MG YB. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 MG YB would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 180 more horse power than 1952 MG YB. (45 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1952 MG YB. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 MG YB weights approximately 94 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Ford E-250 (388 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 309 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 MG YB. (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2009 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 MG YB.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Ford E-250 | 1952 MG YB | |
| Make | Ford | MG |
| Model | E-250 | YB |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
| Engine Size | 4606 cc | 1250 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 225 HP | 45 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 388 Nm | 79 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1060 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 4170 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1510 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1450 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 2520 mm |
