2009 Ford E-250 vs. 1953 Talbot Baby
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Talbot Baby. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Talbot Baby would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 117 more horse power than 1953 Talbot Baby. (108 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1953 Talbot Baby. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Talbot Baby weights approximately 690 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Ford E-250 | 1953 Talbot Baby | |
Make | Ford | Talbot |
Model | E-250 | Baby |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Size | 4606 cc | 2690 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 225 HP | 108 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 966 kg | 1656 kg |
Vehicle Length | 6030 mm | 5060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2020 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 2140 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3510 mm | 3130 mm |